Where the hours go

Five workflows we look at first

Donor acknowledgments & stewardship

Letters drafted from your CRM in your voice, in a review queue, out within a day instead of a week.

Stays human: the development director approves every letter; major and memorial gifts are handled personally.

Grant research & first drafts

Funder fit summarized from guidelines; LOI and narrative first drafts assembled from your approved program language and past applications.

Stays human: funder selection, the final narrative, and every submission.

Program inquiries & intake triage

The same twelve questions answered consistently from your approved FAQ; new intakes checked for completeness and routed.

Stays human: eligibility decisions, anything involving minors or sensitive information.

Board & funder reporting

Board packets and progress reports assembled from the sources you already keep, on a schedule, chased automatically.

Stays human: the ED signs off; numbers are checked against the source.

Meetings to action items

Staff-meeting notes turned into owners, due dates, and follow-ups in the tool you already use.

Stays human: the meeting owner confirms before anything is assigned.

What we won't automate in year one

Eligibility or clinical decisions, anything touching health, legal, or student records, and any communication that goes out without a person's approval. The evaluation screens for these and says so in writing.

Every letter drafted by the system is read by a person before it goes out.
Donor data, funder rules, board questions

Built for how nonprofits are governed.

Donor and participant records stay in your CRM and your own Google or Microsoft accounts; the AI step receives only the fields a letter needs. Funder or contractual rules about where data may be processed are asked about in the first questionnaire and verified before anything is built. And “governance & risk” is one of the six dimensions we score, so your board sees it in the readout, not as an afterthought.

Illustrative example

A 14-person youth-arts nonprofit

Eight routine workflows inventoried, ~84 staff-hours a month. Recommended pilot: acknowledgments, inquiry replies, and LOI first drafts sharing one style guide and one review queue. Base-case capacity returned: about 23 hours a month, with acknowledgments out in one day instead of five to seven.

Synthetic training case from our evaluation method; not a client result. Real, permissioned results will appear here as they are measured.

Start with the evaluation.

From $2,500, fixed fee, with a nonprofit line-item discount shown on every quote. You keep the inventory, the scorecard, and the recommendation whatever you decide.

Not ready for a quote? Book a 20-minute call

Get an evaluation & quote